Depression is a very pervasive health issue today, and it can be a terminal illness. People commit suicide, caused by depression, each and every day.
The traditional approaches have sought to use drugs to address this problem, but I believe there are far better alternatives. But before I get into that, what does the scientific literature show, in terms of short- and long-term effectiveness of the conventional drug approach?
In this interview, Robert Whitaker, who is a medical journalist and author of two books on this important topic, shares what he’s found after tremendous amounts of research.
How Effective are Antidepressants in the Short- and Long-Term?
When looking at the research literature, short-term trials show that antidepressants do NOT provide any clinically significant benefits for mild to moderate depression, compared to a placebo.
And as you know, all drugs have benefit-to-risk ratios, so if a drug is as effective as a placebo in relieving symptoms, it really doesn’t make sense to use them as a first line of defense. And yet doctors all over America prescribe them as if they were indeed sugar pills!
But what about their long-term effectiveness?
According to Whitaker:
“… that’s one of the things I looked at in this book and there are really two things that you find.
You find that even with major depression, in the pre-antidepressant era – and this is depression so severe people were hospitalized – they could expect to get better. The episode would eventually pass.
… So when antidepressants were introduced, the thought was okay, we really can hope to improve on this sort of natural recovery, but maybe we can help people recover quicker? So that really was the rationale for the use of antidepressants.
But it’s really interesting if you follow this course through, forward in history. The minute they start using antidepressants in any sort of large numbers, doctors start saying, “Well, you know, my patients may be getting better, the depression maybe lifting faster, but then we’re noticing that they’re also relapsing more frequently than before, back into depression.”
So right away you get this question: Does the drug treatment actually put people on a more chronic course than before?”
Long-term studies now indicate that of people with major depression, only about 15 percent that are treated with an antidepressant go into remission and stay well for a long period of time.
The remaining 85 percent start having continuing relapses and become chronically depressed.
“By the 1990s, this change in the long term course of depression was so pronounced that finally it was addressed by researchers,” says Whitaker.
“Giovanni Fava from Italy said, “Hey, listen, the course is changing with antidepressants. We’re changing it from an episodic illness to a chronic illness, and we really need to address this.”
Not only that, but the depression is sinking into people [on antidepressants] in a deeper way than before.”
According to Whitaker’s research, this tendency to sensitize the brain to long-term depression appears to be the same both for the earlier tricyclic antidepressants and the newer SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors).
Another famous psycho pharmacologist named Ross Baldessarini at the Harvard Medical School also began asking whether or not these drugs may in fact be depressogenic (causing depression).
Unfortunately, the evidence points that way, and the long-term prognosis when taking antidepressants is quite bleak, as this type of drug treatment has a whopping 85 percent chronic relapse rate.
It’s time for this trend to be broken.
Every year, 230 million prescriptions for antidepressants are filled, making them one of the most-prescribed drugs in the United States. Despite all of these prescription drugs being taken, more than one in 20 Americans are depressed, according to the most recent statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The statistics alone should be a strong indication that what we’re doing is simply not working, and that instead, these drugs are contributing to other serious health problems.
Fortunately, there are other, safer, more effective ways, and some countries are starting to pay heed to the fact that research is actually showing it to be beneficial, rather than bowing to the will of pharmaceutical companies.
What the Research Says about Alternative Treatments for Depression
One study conducted by Duke University in the late 1990’s divided depressed patients into three treatment groups:
Exercise only
Exercise plus antidepressant
Antidepressant drug only
After six weeks, the drug-only group was doing slightly better than the other two groups. However, after 10 months of follow-up, it was the exercise-only group that had the highest remission and stay-well rate.
Some countries are taking these types of research findings seriously, and are starting to base their treatments on the evidence at hand.
The UK, for example, does not routinely recommend antidepressants as the first line of therapy for mild to moderate depression anymore, and doctors there can write out a prescription to see an exercise counselor instead.
“With that prescription… you now get either a reduced rate or a free rate at a gym for six months,” Whitaker explains. “Part of the exercise might be “green gyms”… gardening outside, nature walks, repairing trails, hiking trails. And they are finding that people really like this. People comply with it…
People who have gone through this course and have been prescribed exercise, they say that rather than seeing themselves as a victim of depression, and helpless before it -- that they have this sort of biological problem they can’t do anything about -- they say, “Aha, I can make a change, I can do something. It’s in my willpower to do something that will help this problem lift.”
So it empowers the patient in a different way that drugs do not.”
Since 2007, when this new program was first introduced, the rate of British doctors prescribing exercise for depression has increased from about 4 percent to about 25 percent.
Studies on exercise as a treatment for depression are also showing that there is a strong correlation between improved mood and aerobic capacity. So there’s a growing acceptance that the mind-body connection is very real, and that maintaining good physical health can significantly lower your risk of developing depression in the first place.
Two Side Effects of Antidepressants You Need to Be Aware of
“There are two side effects or risks that really need to be addressed, and that everybody should be thinking about, that show up in the scientific literature,” Whitaker says.
“The first risk is that you’ll convert from unipolar depression to bipolar depression.
… One of the things we’ve seen with the use of the SSRIs is this incredible, extraordinary boom in bipolar diagnoses, and that is definitely tied to the widespread use of antidepressants.
Now, in kids, something like 25 to 50 percent of all kids placed on an antidepressant, who stay on that antidepressant for five years, will convert to bipolar illness. With adults, it seems like about 25 percent of long term of users that begin with a diagnosis of unipolar depression will convert to bipolar.
Bipolar used to be a fairly rare disorder but now it’s becoming much more common. Why is this so bad?
Well, when you convert from depression to bipolar, now you’re in a category where you’re often treated with a cocktail of medications including an antipsychotic medication, and long-term bipolar outcomes are really problematic in this country.
Only about 35 percent of bipolar patients are employed. So you see this risk of disability.
So my point is this, when you go on an antidepressant, you do have a risk of having a manic episode and that is a risk of becoming “a bipolar patient,” and at that moment you’re into a much more long-term problematic disorder that does not have a good outcome today.
The second real risk is that there is a lot of evidence compiling [showing] that if you stay on antidepressants for five, ten, fifteen years, there is some real worry with cognitive decline associated with that long term use.”
Most of you have probably heard that depression is due to a “chemical imbalance in your brain,” which these drugs are designed to correct.
Unfortunately for anyone who has ever swallowed this marketing ploy, this is NOT a scientific statement.
“The low serotonin theory arose because they understood how the drugs acted on the brain,” Whitaker explains.
“But it was just a hypothesis borne to try to explain why the drug might be fixing something. They investigated whether people had low serotonin…[But] in 1983, NIMH concluded that there is no evidence that there is anything wrong in the serotonergic system of depressed patients. And this was in 1983 before Prozac was released.
So there was never evidence that people with depression characteristically had low levels of serotonin.
As one doctor I interviewed about this who did some of this research said, “The serotonin theory of depression is comparable to the masturbatory theory of insanity.” It’s just not a scientific statement.”
Making matters worse, if you do not have low serotonin levels when you’re depressed, but you start taking an SSRI drug that blocks the normal reuptake of serotonin, you end up with the very physiological problem the drug is designed to treat –low serotonin levels. Which, ironically, is the state hypothesized to bring on depression in the first place.
According to Dr. Hyman, once your brain has undergone these compensatory adaptations to the drug, your brain operates in a manner that is “both qualitatively and quantitatively different than normal.”
“So these are not normalizing agents, from a scientific point of view,” Whitaker says.
Really they are abnormalizing agents, and once you understand that, you can understand why maybe they might provoke a manic episode; why they might be associated with sexual dysfunction or violence, acathisia, etcetera.
It’s because they in fact are abnormalizing agents.”
Whitaker discusses numerous other areas of confusion and shares many additional facts about the treatments for depression in this interview, so please, if you or anyone you know suffers from depression, do listen to the entire interview, or read through the transcript.
This is vital information that could very well save your life, or the life of someone close to your heart.
Finding an effective treatment for depression is not something to approach lightly, and having the facts about what actually works, and what doesn’t, is imperative.
In addition, below you will find the four cornerstones of healthy living that would be part of any successful treatment plan.
Other Key Factors to Overcoming Depression
Address your stress -- Depression is a very serious condition, however it is not a “disease.” Rather, it’s a sign that your body and your life are out of balance.
This is so important to remember, because as soon as you start to view depression as an “illness,” you think you need to take a drug to fix it. In reality, all you need to do is return balance to your life, and one of the key ways to doing this is addressing stress.
Meditation or yoga can help. Sometimes all you need to do is get outside for a walk. But in addition to that, I also recommend using a system that can help you address emotional issues that you may not even be consciously aware of. For this, my favorite is Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT). However, if you have depression or serious stress, I believe it would be best to consult with a mental health professional who is also an EFT practitioner to guide you.
Eat a healthy diet -- Another factor that cannot be overlooked is your diet. Foods have an immense impact on your mood and ability to cope and be happy, and eating whole foods as described in my nutrition plan will best support your mental health. Avoiding sugar and grains will help normalize your insulin and leptin levels, which is another powerful tool in addressing depression.
Get plenty of sunshine – Making sure you’re getting enough sunlight exposure to have healthy vitamin D levels is also a crucial factor in treating depression or keeping it at bay. One previous study found that people with the lowest levels of vitamin D were 11 times more prone to be depressed than those who had normal levels. Vitamin D deficiency is actually more the norm than the exception, and has previously been implicated in both psychiatric and neurological disorders.
I don't exactly trust in your masturbatory expert on his opinion on depression, nor do I think you have all the correct answers. I think it is noble that you want to treat depression without medications, and I agree that exercise and the correct absorption of vitamin D play a key role in maiintaining a healthy lifestyle which encourages one to feel good about themselves. But there is a difference between major depression and bipolar disorder, as well as personality disorders like borderline personality disorder and a schizoaffectective disorder which causes grandiose delusions. Stop reading and start experiencing life in a world with schizophrenics, people with multiple personality disorder, and depression that has no obvious environmental cause. That is why these are mental illnesses, and they are not based simply on serotonin levels or we could all eat a baked potato and be fine. Delve into your research and work with some of these afflicted people. I doubt you will have the same view. Give it a good year or two and you will see things you would have denied in your blog today. Best Wishes.
Well, first off your silly comment is based on gross ''assumptions'' leftyeomine! I am a behaviorist of over 40 years and starting my studies in psychology in 1968. (literally before you were born) I have also been a counselor for the past 24 years, so your assumptions are way off base! I would like to know ''your'' credentials in the study of the brain, biochemistry, neuro-psychology, and/or psychology before I bring you some lesson in all the above. I believe it is 'you' who are lacking in expertise and research...but I'm certainly up for something I've been debating most of my life. Now, the ball is in your court! Put up...or shut up! Bring your crying towel and prepare to eat crow! You have brought challenge to me based on your ''assumptions'' which tells me much about you! Bring it!! And don't bring your half-baked education! Even your own page says you don't believe in "Doctors". Seems.... Oxy-moron!
ok reading comments here made me suprised but i ll pretend i didn read them... but i didn understand much what this blog entry means...does it mean antidepressants don help?
Sorry about the comments amysangels, but I really don't like absurd assumptions, nor do I have tolerance for discounting my very needed post. To answer your question, there has been many studies about the efficacy of SSRI's and the long list of ant-depressants, and government studies, which is playing 'low-ball' shows that in 75% of the patients asked, they either didn't work or made them worse. These statistics have been lowered by Big Pharma Propaganda, and many studies show a higher figure, nevertheless, to be making 70% 'worse' (a low figure), to make 30% better is against all medical principals, standards and ethics. I have removed dozens of clients form meds, only to watch them get well, and been thanked countless times for my help....I don't mean to sound boastful here, as its volunteer work, I do not get paid, and it is a work from the heart and only to help my community. The above post is mainly about Depression, and not about the many other mental illnesses. I'm not ''totally' anti-drug but believe they are being grossly over used nd prescribed for profits, and literally killing innocent people because of the very serious side effects. Thank you for reading, and please use the link for more information on the subject. It is extremely important.
Thanks for reading my post Marji, I don't claim to be an expert on drugs, plus there are so many out there that I'm not sure anyone could be...even a pharmacist, so I look them up through the connections that I've grown to know and trust throughout my years of research. I have a very long list on my website in the left-hand column here > http://ewoi.spaces.live.com/ .. You can also find a long list here > .. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ei=EtvlS-XwAo2StAPitsnRCw&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&ved=0CB8QBSgA&q=amitriptyline+%2B+side+effects&spell=1 .. ..although be careful that its not from the makers or a drug company which has ''self interests'. I've removed people from Amitriptyline and found great results, and I would never take it myself, although I don't know your symptoms.
I agree wholeheartedly with what you include in your blog here... I'm sorry people have believed too easily that depression is a result only of a "chemical imbalance" that can be corrected by drugs... There's so much more that can be done and you show this in your blog... Thank you MusicMouse!
I found it extremely interesting and helpful,my doc prescibed amitripiline but as im taking strong pain killers the combination made me extremely sick.Every time i go back they keep trying other drugs,with little or no effect.So i would rather fight this without,being a guinea pig.
Literaturegirl, Marji, and Kittywake, thank you all for your kind comments and coming to read this important post. Please spread this info to all you think would need it, especially friends and family members. I've known many people in my lifetime to be on these serious drugs and many are no longer here to give their testimonial, including my oldest daughter who finally succumbed to doctors feeding her far too many drugs, and it finally took her life. Don't let it happen to you. Your right Kittywake, guinea pigs is what they've made of us, and all for ''money''!
Wow! Thanks for the info. A lot to digest, but so important. I've had two serious accidents with head injuries. 1st 2003 was whiplash and concussion - I still have no memory of the incident. The whiplash was very bad and has left me with compromised disks in the neck and back. I've had years of physical therapy but although much better, have pain often.
The 2nd in July 2007 was very bad. My right eye socket, cheek and nose were smashed. I have titanium plates now, and look good, although there is a fair amount of difference between left and right sides of my face. I had a serious concussion, detached retinas, 15 broken teeth and leg injuries. I also have no memory of this one. My eyes are still a problem, as I formed cataracts from the injuries. I've had a total of 10 operations on the eyes, and have to live with not being able to see properly in close-up.
Both times I suffered PTSD and have been on anti-depressants since 2003! I also had short-term sleeping pills, and masses of painkillers after the 2nd accident. I still have pain in my left hip, knee and ankle but I can live with it, and am able to walk properly. I have trouble sleeping, but take a mild herbal pill occassionally (not more than 2x weekly).
I'm still on an anti-depressant. How do I come off? I'm seriously concerned. Thanks hon
Hi Cabcraft and I'm very sorry for your struggles. Anti-depressants are hard to come off of for the simple reason the drug companies don't want you to, therefore they have made drugs in 'doses' not relevant to removal, intentionally to keep you on the drug. You must come off of them very slowly, by cutting them in half or quarters or pouring a little out of the capsule and trying to measure it as accurately as you can. I would think that if you have good 'support' .. therapist .. family .. friends, you can remove yourself from the drugs, which many times cure or solve many other emotional or sleep problems when you do. Take several ''months'' to slowly remove the drugs and you may surprised that many side effects from them will go away and you'll start feeling better...emotionally and physically. Thanks for your real life testimonial. Its very helpful, nd please post back if you need extra help, or have made changes in you dug reduction, as follow up is very important to others who are doing the same thing.
Thanks for posting this MM. It's certainly a thought provoking read. While I agree we've evolved into a culture who expect a pill to cure all our ailments, I'm not sure all depression can be successfully managed in the same way. There is definitely a mind/body connection here. I do believe in taking personal responsibilty for your health. What's been written regarding the importance of diet and excercise can not be overlooked. While I do think drugs are prescribed too freely, in some cases they really are beneficial. I think the key may be the combination of meds (carefully monitored), therapy and lifetyle changes. This is certainly a topic I'll continue to research for myself. Thanks for giving me a great starting point.
Thanks Sappy, this is the major studies of my lifetimes work because I saw something very wrong with 'clinical' studies early, because of my 'out-of-the-box' individual way of thinking in all my studies. I go way back, starting with Miller, Mennanger, Monet, Maslow, and countless others involved in the pioneering of psychology, and I took notice of many flaws in their theories. By the time I was through with my second study text 'Psychology, the Hybrid Science" I was ready to toss it all in the trash, because of the much different ''science'' taking place outside of university text and teachings. I have been following the sequence of psychology and psychiatry, and drug infiltrated psychiatry sense those early years and have witnessed a huge problem by drug company 'culture' and public sentiment with all the ''marketing'' ...literally brain washing the public into thinking there's a 'pill' for everything. One thing people overlook, is that what you put into your ''bloodstream'' goes ''everywhere''...to other organs that don't need or could be negatively effected by the drugs your taking. A drug [chemical] doesn't go to the specific are it is needed. It goes ''everywhere'' via the bloodstream. Those chemicals effect ''everything'' in your body, and thats the problem in a nut-shell. Your welcome to go here > http://ewoi.spaces.live.com/ My website has a very long list of resources in the Left-hand column .. under "Mental Health" and Real Health. They are my hand picked choices who are true health advocates and not 'on-the-take'.
Thanks Sappy, it's on of 3 website I've built for Eyes Wide Ope Int. that is mainly link pages. I only post news and info every so often as time allows. Hundreds of great links there for a large variety of topics. Please pass it on to others if you wish. Its all volunteer work and up to us to bring needed information...because no one else will without getting 'paid'. ;~(O)
DID YOU ALL KNOW, THAT, YOU SHOULDN'T TAKE NSAIDS, OF ANY KIND, WITH ANTIDEPRESANTS, AND THEY PRESCRIBE THE BOTH OF THEM, TOGETHER, FOR FIBROMYALGIA..
IT CAN CAUSE IRRITATION, OF THE STOMACH..THEN, THEY PRESCRIBE, PILOSEC, OTC..FOR THE STOMACH..THEN, THE PATIENT STILL, COMPLAINS, OF DEPRESSION, SAY THE PATIENT WANTS NARCOTICS, AND, GIVES THEM, ANOTGHER NSAID...
NOW, WE EVEN HAVE THE NEW...ANTIDEPRESIVE DRUG..BOOOSTERS, LIKE, AMBILIFY..
NOW, WHEN THE MUCOSA[ LINING OF THE STOMACH, OH, AND THE REST OF THE INTESTINAL TRACT, ALSO], GET IRRITATED, THE ABSORPTION RATE, OF ALL MEDICATIONS, ARE COMPROMISE...HENCE,
WHY THE FURK, DOESN'T THE FDA, DO SOME RESEARCH ON THAT...WHY, BECAUSE THE DRUG INDUSTRY, WOULD NOT HAVE TO INVEST MORE MONEY, INTO THE SUPER, AMBILIFY, WHEN THE PATENTS RUN OUT, AND THE GENERICS, COME INTO PLAY..NEW DRUGGS, HIGH COSTS FOR YRS, AND WHAM, A NOTHER BOOSTER DRUG..FOR EVERYTHING...
These are all common sense approaches. I agree too often Dr.s head for the script pad. Like so many other things if people would approach their health with a basic premise of pre-medical care. (We do Preventive maintenance on machines...duh...same applies to the body), then there would be less need for medications.
But....and here's my small sticking point...there are times that the chemical imbalances within the brain require a prescriptive intervention.
I see psycho-tropic medication as a last resort. Sadly it has become the first and only. And the way they are prescribed seems hit and miss. "we'll try this...oh you're suicidal now? hmmm try this one"
Part is society and how in general it seeks instant everything. Part is enviromental...we lock ourselves inside away from the sun, and breathe artifically conditioned air (to avoid sick building syndrome), and eat genetically altered food, or over processed food, and 'fast' food. Basically incasing ourselves in artifical worlds.
It's no wonder our bodies and our psyche rebel and make us ill.
Thank you for your input Chipper. I love for my friends to add their personal experiences and information, which is much better than ''clinical evidence''. People simply don't know who to believe anymore and I trust real life experience the most. Very true that BIG Pharma has created a science that leads you into multiple drug use, one causing a side effect that leads to another and then another, until ...well, your dead! This is exactly what happened to my oldest daughter last year and caused her death. Drug companies..."murder for money program" and people need to be aware of it. ..............Thank you Tzech for your comment too. I only wish that what would seem the common sense approach was easy, like it should be, but unfortunately its very complicated...depending much on where you live and your local resources. We are nearly 'all' being poisoned by our water, air, and food making it extremely hard to stay healthy without some types of supplements. Pure organic food is expensive, if you can even find it. Concerning "chemical imbalances within the brain"...there is ''no such thing''. This has been studied by many ''out-o-the-box'' scientists and just old 'phramganda' looking for another 'label' to push drugs. There is absolutely no proof of bio-chemical imbalances in the brain other than what takes place in everyones brain. I've studied bio-chemistry and the brain for many years and when that ploy came out many years ago, scientists in the field were asked to 'prove it'.They have yet to show any tangible proof that simply can't be disproven. Not only that but turning the bio-chemistry of the brain around in any sense by introducing to the blood stream is a silly notion to begin with because of neurology and the effect it has on our nervous system and other organs. It simply wont work without killer side effects on all the above. Psycho-tropics can be used in traumatic cases, but only for short term before they start to devastate, not only the bod organs, but even the brain it is trying to help. Yes, very last resort and short term...but thats simply not being done. Yes too, like I described about and how difficult out ''industrial complex'' has enveloped us with one industry feeding money to the other. Its a very complicated systematic process they have put on us, and if we don't figure out a way around it, we will die young and of disease. Not a fun way to go in my book. Thank you both for your input...;~))
Be a part of the biggest social experience on the web. Where who you are is more important than who you know. Share what matters the most and find others who just "get it."